{{byline}}
By now everyone is painfully aware that even a modest data breach at a medium-sized company can cause a world of pain. Cyber response costs alone (including reimbursing credit card companies for having to issue replacement cards) can run into the millions. There also are costs associated with discovering and fixing the breach and instituting appropriate security and administrative controls to ensure that such a breach "never happens again" (an optimistic statement, but there you have it). And once a breach becomes public, reputational costs leading to a loss of customer trust and related goodwill are impossible to predict.
Franchises are not immune from this type of reputational devastation. In recent years, big names like Home Depot, Dairy Queen, Goodwill, Supervalu, UPS, and Wendy's have all suffered massive, costly data breaches. In fact, because of their large consumer base and the potentially decentralized nature of their IT operations, franchises are prime targets for hackers. While response costs are likely not much different than at other businesses, the reputational fallout for a franchise that suffers a data breach is potentially far worse.
Franchisors routinely require franchisees to adhere to design guidelines on the look and feel of their retail stores and often mandate that supplies be purchased from a list of reputable providers, all in the name of maintaining brand reputation. Privacy and cybersecurity should be no different. By requiring franchisees to comply with a firm set of data protection requirements and ensuring compliance through routine audits, the chances of a breach, and the concomitant reputational loss, can be greatly reduced.
Imagine that a hacker decides to target four or five Dallas-based units of a national franchise, all owned by a single franchisee. Because the franchisee's POS devices are not compliant with PCI-DSS, the hacker is able to steal the credit card information of thousands of the local franchisee's customers. Once the breach becomes public (and state breach notification requirements make public disclosure a virtual certainty), the name of the franchise becomes associated with the breach--even if the franchisor did nothing wrong.
This affects not only the franchisor, but also every other franchisee whose data was not compromised because the brand takes the hit through "guilt by association." A good PR firm may be able to help confine the negative impact to only the careless franchisee and its units, but the cost to do so may be prohibitively expensive. Moreover, the franchisor is forced to react to the situation after it has occurred, instead of trying to get out in front with preventive measures.
While there is no guarantee that preventive measures, however stringent, will stop a data breach from occurring (indeed, the worn cliche is that it's not "if" but "when"), there are several options that franchisors should consider to minimize the chances of an illegal intrusion and thus be able to credibly declare that "We did everything we could" to prevent the loss of personal information.
Franchisors go to great lengths to ensure the consistency of their brand across franchisees and locations, yet this diligence may not extend to information systems and cybersecurity. Fix that oversight and your system stands a better chance of weathering the storm when a data breach occurs.
Eric Levy, Edward (Eddie) Block, and Peter Vogel are attorneys at Gardere Wynne Sewell. Levy is a senior attorney focusing on transactional and compliance matters related to information privacy and security. Block has more than 20 years of experience as an information security professional. Vogel is a trial partner who chairs the firm's Internet, eCommerce & Technology Group and co-chairs the Cybersecurity & Privacy Group.